Datrick
Start a conversation
Senior-led database delivery
Keep PostgreSQL workloads maintainable and recoverable with senior DBA support across monitoring, query performance, maintenance, replication, and database change.
US-incorporated · Senior-led · Direct and under-your-brand delivery
When to bring us in
For teams running PostgreSQL on their own infrastructure or a managed cloud service, especially when growth, slow queries, maintenance gaps, or a migration exceeds internal DBA capacity.
Service scope
Investigate expensive queries, execution plans, index use, long transactions, lock waits, connection pressure, and workload changes. Review available statistics and obtain approval before enabling additional collection.
Review vacuum and analyze behavior, table growth, transaction age, maintenance timing, and application transaction patterns. Document corrective work and the effect on write load and availability.
Map replication topology, lag, slots, WAL retention, backups, recovery access, and restore evidence. Agree what is covered by the cloud provider and what remains the customer's operating responsibility.
Assess extensions, SQL behavior, roles, jobs, drivers, and deployment dependencies when moving to PostgreSQL or upgrading it. Validate representative transactions and prepare rollback and handover plans.
What you receive
The written scope identifies environments, owners, deliverables, exclusions, access, service hours, and acceptance. A senior lead reviews your inquiry and recommends the next step within one business day.
Delivery approach
Review version, hosting, workload, incidents, and access.
Rank performance, maintenance, and recovery risks.
Test approved changes against representative workload.
Operate the agreed scope and update the technical backlog.
Related delivery evidence
Datrick's published partner case describes an initial database and migration delivery need that grew into more than five years of recurring DBA/NOC, BI, reporting, and analytics work. It demonstrates a delivery relationship, rather than a platform-specific performance guarantee.
Read the full case studyBefore you engage
Yes, subject to the platform and agreed scope. We distinguish service-provider controls from customer-owned query, schema, configuration, backup-policy, access, and application responsibilities.
Yes. Retrieval workloads, index behavior, data freshness, access boundaries, and application dependencies can be assessed alongside the transactional estate. AI-specific ownership is identified in the scope.
Yes. Start with authorized access, repositories, monitoring, backup records, incident history, and stakeholder context. Missing runbooks and ownership are reconstructed before broader responsibilities are accepted.
We first collect evidence and agree the change route. Potentially disruptive actions require review, a suitable execution window, validation, and a recovery plan.
Discuss the next step
Share the platform, business impact, current ownership, and timeline. A senior lead will recommend a scoped next step.